streams
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
streams [2013/08/26 10:04] – [Note] j.t.buist | streams [2013/11/04 10:36] (current) – removed justin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Streams & Halo Stars ====== | ||
- | Go to internal page: http:// | ||
- | |||
- | These mock data are designed to mimic cold/hot streams in the Milky Way halo and the halo star population. Key questions are: | ||
- | |||
- | (1) What can we learn about the gravitational potential from such cold streams or halo stars? (2) Can we find clear evidence for triaxiality? | ||
- | |||
- | If posting new tests, please try to approximately follow the template set out for the " | ||
- | |||
- | **Key working group coordinator: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Spherical Halo ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Robyn Sanderson has created a mock Galactic stellar halo for use in testing various algorithms for recovering the Milky Way's gravitational potential from measurements of the phase space positions of tidal streams. Currently the test data for a spherical halo is available and axisymmetric and triaxial potentials will be added shortly. The process generating the satellites that dissolve into streams is decoupled from the potential in which the streams are integrated, so that the same set of progenitor satellites can be compared across different potentials. | ||
- | |||
- | This challenge comes in two parts: (I) determine the form of the spherical potential in which the streams are orbiting and (II) determine the best-fit parameters for that form. You may choose to do part II only, or both parts I and II. | ||
- | |||
- | The mock halo has been provided by Robyn Sanderson (questions/ | ||
- | |||
- | **InitialConditions.pdf** gives the details of how the halo was generated. This document deliberately doesn' | ||
- | |||
- | If you wish to try recovering just the parameters and not the form of the potential (part II), the form of the potential used for the halo is found in **potentialForm.pdf**. If you want to also recover the form (part I), use this file to check your work. The potential parameters are revealed in the document **potentialParameters.pdf**. | ||
- | |||
- | The tarball includes 5 ASCII data files that are listed below. In all files, the first line is the number of lines after that line in the file. So to read things in, read the first integer to get n_lines, then read n_lines of data. | ||
- | |||
- | **MilkyWay1.dat** includes the positions (in kpc) and velocities (in km/s) of the stars in the halo after convolution with the Gaia error model. | ||
- | |||
- | **MilkyWay1.ne.dat** are the same positions/ | ||
- | |||
- | **MilkyWay1.obs.dat** are the coordinates and errors in the observed space. The 11 columns are visual magnitude, right ascension (rad), declination (rad), parallax (mas), par error, mu_alpha (proper motion in RA, mas/yr), pm error, mu_delta (proper motion in dec, mas/yr), pm error, radial velocity (km/s), RV error. | ||
- | |||
- | **MilkyWay1.sats.dat** is a list of the locations of the first star in each progenitor satellite in the above three files. The stars are in the same order in all three files, sorted by progenitor, so the stars belonging to progenitor i are at positions sats(i): | ||
- | |||
- | **MilkyWay1.info.dat** contains the properties of the progenitor satellites that produced the streams in the data set. The 9 columns are satellite ID# (from the larger sample that these are drawn from), total number of [RGB] stars in the satellite, time since infall in Myr, log luminosity in solar units, log *total* mass (stars+dark matter) in solar masses, scale radius in kpc, velocity dispersion in km/s, orbital apocenter radius in kpc, and orbital circularity [from 0 (=radial) to 1 (=circular)]. | ||
- | |||
- | A copy of this page is also included as **README.html**. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====Publication policy==== | ||
- | |||
- | When making use of this data, please cite the Gaia Challenge Wiki and Sanderson, Helmi, & Hogg 2014, in Proc. IAU Symposium 298, Setting the Scene for Gaia and LAMOST, ed. S. Feltzing, G. Zhao, N.A. Walton & P.A. Whitelock. A short description of the creation of the mock stellar halo is in section 2 of this report. Stay tuned: this reference should change soon as a more complete description is submitted in the next few months. | ||
- | |||
- | Good luck! | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | =====Stellar Substructure in the Galactic Halo===== | ||
- | |||
- | Ana Bonaca, Adrian Price-Whelan and Andreas Küpper have designed a challenge to model stellar streams in the Galactic halo. The challenge comes in three complementary parts: (1) a warm dwarf galaxy stream and (2) a cold globular cluster stream, both computed in a static, analytic Milky Way-like potential, and (3) a set of cold streams created in a live dark matter potential. | ||
- | |||
- | ====1. The Sagittarius Stream==== | ||
- | |||
- | Included in this challenge are particles selected from the Law & Majewski (2010; LM10) simulation of satellite disruption along an orbit similar to the Sagittarius (Sgr) dwarf galaxy. The goal of this challenge is to use present-day, | ||
- | |||
- | ===Specifications=== | ||
- | |||
- | Assume we know the position and velocity of the Sgr progenitor perfectly: | ||
- | |||
- | X,Y,Z = (19.788, 2.396, -5.848) kpc | ||
- | |||
- | U,V,W = (224.707, -35.254, 196.671) km/s | ||
- | |||
- | LM10 take Vlsr = 220 km/s, Rsun = 8 kpc. | ||
- | |||
- | All positions are in kpc, velocities in km/s, proper motions in mas/yr, angles in degrees. | ||
- | |||
- | ===Part 1=== | ||
- | |||
- | // | ||
- | |||
- | ===Part 2=== | ||
- | |||
- | // | ||
- | |||
- | The positions and velocities have been ‘observed’ assuming [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | ===Misc.=== | ||
- | |||
- | // | ||
- | |||
- | ===Publication policy=== | ||
- | |||
- | When making use of data in this part of the challenge, please cite the Gaia Challenge Wiki; Law & Majewski, 2010, ApJ, 714, 229; and Price-Whelan et al., in prep. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====2. The Palomar 5 Stream==== | ||
- | |||
- | This part of the challenge focuses on a cold stellar stream produced by a low-mass globular cluster. For this purpose, an //N//-body model of the outer-halo Milky Way cluster Palomar 5 is provided. It has been evolved for 4 Gyr in an analytic Milky Way-like potential using a modified version of the direct N-body code [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | Given perfect information on the positions and velocities of all Palomar 5 members, how well can the underlying potential be determined? This is basically as good as it gets. From this ideal case, more realistic and tougher challenges can be constructed by reducing the sample size, reducing phase-space information, | ||
- | |||
- | An interesting question is also the influence of the choice of solar parameters on the results (i.e. Galactocentric distance, LSR velocity, etc.). The assumed values are given below. | ||
- | |||
- | How does Gaia help us with determining Pal 5's orbit? Get the model data file convolved with the Gaia error model [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===Specifications=== | ||
- | |||
- | The file // | ||
- | |||
- | The Cartesian coordinates are given in the Galactic rest frame. The observables were derived assuming a solar Galactocentric distance of 8.33 kpc and a LSR motion of 239.5 km/s (Gillessen et al., 2009, ApJ, 692, 1075). In addition, the solar reflex motion was assumed to be (11.1, 12.24, 7.25) km/s (Schönrich et al., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1829). | ||
- | |||
- | The present-day position of Palomar 5 is RA = 229.022083 deg, Dec = -0.111389 deg or l = 0.852059 deg, b = 45.859989 deg, respectively. The present-day Cartesian coordinates of the progenitor are | ||
- | |||
- | * x = 7816.082584 pc | ||
- | * y = 240.023507 pc | ||
- | * z = 16640.055966 pc | ||
- | * vx = -37.456858 km/s | ||
- | * vy = -151.794112 km/s | ||
- | * vz = -21.609662 km/s | ||
- | |||
- | The Gaia uncertainties mess up the radial velocities and proper motions of the stream stars, but maybe the sheer number of stars can help us here. | ||
- | |||
- | {{ : | ||
- | |||
- | {{ : | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===Publication policy=== | ||
- | |||
- | When making use of data in this part of the challenge, please cite the Gaia Challenge Wiki; and Küpper et al., in prep. | ||
- | |||
- | ====3. The Via Lactea Streams==== | ||
- | |||
- | This final part of the challenge consists of cold stellar streams evolved in the Via Lactea II (VL2) potential. Via Lactea, a pure dark matter //N//-body simulation, resembles a Milky Way-sized dark matter halo with about 10% of the mass being in subhaloes at z=0 (see Diemand et al., 2008, Nature, 454, 735 for more details). The streams were generated in a re-simulation of the final 6 Gyr of the original VL2 computation using the streakline method described in Küpper et al., 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2700. [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | This part of the challenge comes in two parts: | ||
- | |||
- | 1. What is the best-fit potential of the VL2 at z=0 given a certain stream? | ||
- | |||
- | 2. Assuming Gaia uncertainties for positions and velocities of stream stars, how does the confidence in best-fit potential parameters depend on the stream distance from the observer? | ||
- | |||
- | ===Specifications=== | ||
- | |||
- | Provided are current positions and velocities of four streams with Palomar 5-like progenitors, | ||
- | |||
- | ===Publication policy=== | ||
- | |||
- | When making use of data in this part of the challenge, please cite the Gaia Challenge Wiki; Diemand et al., 2008, Nature, 454, 735; and Bonaca et al., in prep. | ||
- | |||
- | =====Aquarius Challenge===== | ||
- | |||
- | What can you learn about a galaxy' | ||
- | |||
- | The dataset is based on a dark matter N-body simulation populated with stars. The simulation used is the Aquarius A halo (Springel et al. 2008). The Cooper et al 2010 method has been used to populate the halo with stars. This uses the semi-analytical model Galform to predict star formation occurring in each subhalo. The stellar mass is then tagged onto the most bound 1% dark matter particles in the corresponding haloes in the N-body simulation at the appropriate times. These tagged dark matter particles can be located in the final snapshot to track where the stellar mass ends up. | ||
- | |||
- | ===Stream catalogue=== | ||
- | |||
- | 10 streams extracted from the Aquarius A-2 simulation. These have been visually selected as extended, coherent objects in the process of disruption. Each stream is made up by a random subset of the stars that were once a member of the progenitor satellite. In each case while the majority of stars will either be in the satellite or in the stream structure, however, a notable fraction may be completely disassociated. | ||
- | |||
- | The Sun has been placed at 8 kpc with a velocity of (0, | ||
- | |||
- | [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | Streams have been populated with one red KIII giant per 40 solar masses of stars (Helmi et al. 2011; Marigo et al. 2008), with M_V = 1, V-I = 1. The sample includes stars with G band > 20, which would be outside of the Gaia limits. Removing these stars eliminates several of the streams. | ||
- | |||
- | ===Complete mock catalogue=== | ||
- | |||
- | A complete mock catalogue containing all the stars in the accreted stellar halo is also available at http:// | ||
- | |||
- | Additional information is available about the halo, including the dark matter particle data and subhalo catalogues. Contact Ben Lowing for questions < | ||
- | |||
- | ==Publication policy== | ||
- | |||
- | When making use of data in this part of the challenge, please cite the Gaia Challenge Wiki; and Lowing et al., in prep. | ||
- | =====Ensemble of streams in NFW Halo + Hernquist Bulge + Miyamoto & Nagai Disk===== | ||
- | (Raphael, erraph[at]gmail[dot]com) | ||
- | I'm running N-Body simulations in a static potential consisting of a spherical NFW Halo (ApJ, 490, 493), a spherical Hernquist Bulge (ApJ, 356, 359) and an axis-symmetric Miyamoto & Nagai Disk (PASJ, 27, 533 | ||
- | ). | ||
- | |||
- | {{http:// | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | You get full phase space information in a galactocentric cartesian frame of reference. | ||
- | I'll post ASCII files for 10^6 mass points each here soon, containing both stream and progenitor. | ||
- | There is self-interaction between the stream particles and between progenitor and stream. | ||
- | |||
- | The progenitor has a Dehnen (MNRAS, 265, 250) density profile, if you prefer I can provide a selection of central stars following a Plummer profile. | ||
- | |||
- | Here's the first stream. It's more a stream of CDM then of stars, because I uploaded phase space data for all mass points, but I can paint the mass points with a probability of being a star drawn from a Plummer profile. The total mass is 10^9 solar masses, the dwarf had 8 Gyrs of time to be stripped. | ||
- | Just let me know if the format is o.k. for you, then I'll upload more streams with different orbits, and if you want also with different masses / numbers of stars. | ||
- | |||
- | {{http:// | ||
- | |||
- | The file format is x, | ||
- | For simplicity I provide distinct files for the progenitor and the stream. | ||
- | |||
- | [[https:// | ||
- | |||
- | =====12 different streams in the same spherical potential===== | ||
- | (Hans Buist, buist[at]astro[dot]rug[dot]nl) | ||
- | I have prepared several simulations of testparticle streams in a fixed spherical NFW potential. I have run the code for 12 different orbits. The particles have been evolved for roughly 8 Gyr. Can you find the scale mass and radius of the potential? | ||
- | |||
- | (I also have time-evolving potentials available if anyone wants to try those. ) | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | These files are provided as ASCII files with rows of 6 coordinates, | ||
- | {{https:// | ||
- | |||
- | ======Evolving streams====== | ||
- | (Hans Buist, buist[at]astro[dot]rug[dot]nl) | ||
- | |||
- | Here I provided 2 different streams evolved in a spherical NFW potential, evolving in time. Data again in ASCII files. | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Description of Potential ==== | ||
- | {{: | ||
- | Note: currently only Sculptor | ||
- | ==== Description of Simulation ==== | ||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Used Cosmology ==== | ||
- | * Omega_m = 0.29 | ||
- | * Omega_m + Omega_Lambda = 1.0 | ||
- | * h_100 = 0.71 | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== Files ==== | ||
- | Positions are in kpc, velocities in kpc/Gyr (~km/s) | ||
- | |||
- | * {{http:// | ||
- | * {{http:// | ||
- | * {{http:// | ||
- | * {{http:// | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Note on files ===== | ||
- | The first particle is the position of the ' | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Publication policy ==== | ||
- | Soon this evolution model for potentials will be published in a research note :-). If you use them, please reference Buist & Helmi 2013 (in prep) |
streams.1377511441.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 11:57 (external edit)