tests:astropars:challenge3
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tests:astropars:challenge3 [2014/10/31 10:59] – [GSP-Phot vs. SICK] randrae | tests:astropars:challenge3 [2022/10/24 12:26] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| * Teff from 4000K to 8000K. | * Teff from 4000K to 8000K. | ||
| * Test spectra created by GOG. (Not by our own forward models!) | * Test spectra created by GOG. (Not by our own forward models!) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Examples of posterior samples == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Posterior distributions mostly well behaved for BP/RP, i.e., fast convergence, | ||
| + | * Even in simple case the posteriors cannot be well approximated by a Gaussian. | ||
| + | * Rare examples with multimodal posterior. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| == Results for fitting BP/RP alone == | == Results for fitting BP/RP alone == | ||
| Line 40: | Line 50: | ||
| + | == Future tests == | ||
| + | * Compare initial guesses of GSP-Phot and SICK. (Possibly SVM fails for noisy data, which may explain why SICK estimates [Fe/H] better at faint magnitudes.) | ||
tests/astropars/challenge3.1414753147.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:26 (external edit)