Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tests:collision:challenge1 [2014/10/31 14:00] – gieles
+++ tests:collision:challenge1 [2015/08/31 12:21] (current) – removed v.henault-brunet
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Challenge 1 ======
-===== Equal mass cluster in isolation and in a tidal field =====
-PI: Alice Zocchi\\
-Co-I: Vincent Henault-Brunet\\
-Other active participants: Antonio Sollima, Mark Gieles, Anna Lisa Varri
-Questions to address:
-  - What is a suitable model to describe post-collapse clusters? We here consider 3 models:
-        - Isotropic King (1966)
-        - Anisotropic Michie King
-        - $f_\nu$ [[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...584..729B|Bertin & Trenti (2003)]]; [[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A%26A...539A..65Z|Zocchi et al. (2012)]]
-  - How much does tangential anisotropy/retrograde rotation due to the tides matter?
-The relevant snapshots from simulations of an isolated cluster and cluster within a tidal field are available in [[:tests:collision:mock_data|section A of the Mock data page]].
-==== Comparison $f_\nu$ and isolated models ====
-{{:4_450_ANIS.png?400}}
-==== MCMC fit results to tidally limited models ====
-===== Isotropic lowered isothermal models =====
-{{:woolley.png?400}}{{:king.png?400}}{{:wilson.png?400}}
-Example comparison between the 3 best-fit isotropic lowered isothermal spheres at different times:\\
-{{:T100020.png?400}}{{:T350520.png?400}}
-===== Anisotropic lowered isothermal models =====
-Preliminary results for a Michie-style anisotropy fit:\\
-{{:T100020_michie.png?400}}