Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tests:collision:challenge2 [2014/10/31 13:52] – gieles
+++ tests:collision:challenge2 [2015/08/31 12:23] (current) – removed v.henault-brunet
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Challenge 2 ======
-===== Clusters with a mass function =====
-PI: Miklos Peuten\\
-Co-I: Mark Gieles\\
-Other active participants: Alice Zocchi, Antonio Sollima, Vincent Henault-Brunet, Anna Lisa Varri
-Questions to address:
-  - Can the mass segregation be reproduced by multi-mass King models?
-  - How important is the effect of mass segregation?
-  - How correct is the assumption of energy equipartition?
-Example of comparison between isotropic multi-mass model and N-body model with 100% retention fraction of stellar BHs:\\
-{{:multi-mass.png?300}}
-The relevant snapshots from simulations with a mass function are available in [[:tests:collision:mock_data|section B of the Mock data page]].
-The definition of the stellar types (KSTAR) used in the ''NBODY6'' snapshots can be found in the [[:tests:collision:mock_data|Appendix section of the Mock data page]].
-Anisotropy profile of different components in multi-mass clusters. Left: N-body simulation with 10% retention fraction of black holes. Right: Three-component multi-mass Michie model.
-{{:beta_multi-mass.png}}
-Anisotropy profile of different mass components in Michie-King multi-mass model constructed with a dependence of the anisotropy radius on stellar mass.
-{{:beta_multi-mass_eta.png}}
-Anisotropy profile of different components in multi-mass cluster, N-body simulation with 100% retention fraction of black holes.
-{{:beta0p5gyr.png}}