User Tools

Site Tools


tests:collision:gc4:method_comp

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
tests:collision:gc4:method_comp [2016/10/13 10:19] gielestests:collision:gc4:method_comp [2022/10/24 12:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 ==== M4 mass modelling / method comparison results ==== ==== M4 mass modelling / method comparison results ====
 +
  
  
Line 6: Line 7:
  
 Mass function: Mass function:
-| Model            | $M_j$       $m_j|  +| Model            | M_j             | M_j/M_tot         | m_j                 | m_j/m_1 
-| 1B. GG79 Model A | [5, 1, 0.1] | [0.5, 1, 1.5]| +| 1B. GG79 Model A | [5.0, 1, 0.1] |[0.82, 0.16, 0.02] |                     | [0.50, 1, 1.5]| 
-| 1C. Actual MF    | [0.433, 0.14, 0.422] | [0.374, 0.782, 0.674] | +| 1C. Actual MF    | [3.1, 1, 3.0] |[0.43, 0.14, 0.42] | [0.37, 0.78, 0.674] | [0.47, 1, 0.86]|
  
 Results: Results:
Line 32: Line 33:
 {{:tests:collision:gc4:sb_sigma_actual_mf.png?200}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:sb_sigma_actual_mf.png?200}}
 {{:tests:collision:gc4:ml_actual_mf.png?200}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:ml_actual_mf.png?200}}
 +
 +
 +
 +===== Laura's Results =====
 +
 +**Dynamical models**: Spherical Jeans Anisotropic MGE (JAM) models.
 +
 +**Data-model comparison**: discrete maximum likelihoods.
 +
 +**Assumptions**:
 +  - Models are spherical.
 +  - Anisotropy is beta=1-v_theta^2/v_r^2.
 +  - Models assume no rotation.
 +  - Surface brightness profile is known.
 +  - No background contamination, all stars are cluster members.
 +
 +**Additional comments**:
 +  - Surface brightness and surface mass density are input as Multi-Gaussian Expansions (MGEs). I fit an MGE to the SB profile on the wiki and then used this for all my models, so SB is fixed (see Assumption #4). Unless explicitly stated below, I assume that the surface mass profile is a scaled version of the SB profile. If I assume a constant M/L then all SB MGE components are multiplied by the same M/L value to get the surface mass profile. If I assume a variable M/L then each Gaussian component of the MGE is multiplied by a different value.
 +  - Anisotropy is specified for each Gaussian component of the SB MGE. If I assume constant anisotropy, then all SB components have the same anisotropy. If I assume variable anisotropy, I then each component is given a different anisotropy value.
 +  - I actually fit beta'=beta/(2-beta). This has the appealing property of being symmetric about 0 and finite in extent. beta'=0 is isotropy, beta'=1 is purely radial orbits and beta'=-1 is purely tangential. I only allow beta to vary between 1 and -50 to prevent extremely tangential orbits as this can cause my code to crash.
 +
 +
 +==== Line-of-sight velocities only ====
 +
 +=== Model 1: constant M/L ===
 +
 +Extra assumptions:
 +  - distance is known
 +  - model is isotropic
 +  - M/L is constant
 +
 +Fit for constant M/L only: 1 free parameter.
 +
 +{{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_ml_fit_mass.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_ml_fit_ml.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_ml_fit_rv_disp.png?200|}}
 +
 +=== Model 2: constant M/L, constant anisotropy, distance ===
 +
 +Extra assumptions:
 +  - anisotropy is constant
 +  - M/L is constant
 +
 +Fit for constant M/L, constant anisotropy, distance: 3 free parameters.
 +
 +{{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_mlad_fit_mass.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_mlad_fit_ml.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_mlad_fit_rv_disp.png?200|}}
 +
 +=== Model 3: variable M/L ===
 +
 +Extra assumptions:
 +  - distance is known
 +  - model is isotropic
 +
 +Fit for M/L per Gaussian component of SB MGE: 8 MGE components --> 8 parameters.
 +
 +{{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_mlvary_fit_mass.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_mlvary_fit_ml.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:rv_mlvary_fit_rv_disp.png?200|}}
 +
 +
 +
 +==== Line-of-sight velocities and Proper motions ====
 +
 +=== Model 1: constant M/L, constant anisotropy, distance ===
 +
 +Extra assumptions:
 +  - anisotropy is constant
 +  - M/L is constant
 +
 +Fit for constant M/L, constant anisotropy, distance: 3 free parameters.
 +
 +{{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlad_fit_mass.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlad_fit_ml.png?200|}}
 +
 +{{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlad_fit_pmr_disp.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlad_fit_pmt_disp.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlad_fit_rv_disp.png?200|}}
 +
 +
 +=== Model 2: M/L, anisotropy, distance ===
 +
 +Fit for variable M/L (8 components), variable anisotropy (8 components), distance: 17 free parameters.
 +
 +{{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlavaryd_fit_mass.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlavaryd_fit_ml.png?200|}}
 +
 +{{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlavaryd_fit_pmr_disp.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlavaryd_fit_pmt_disp.png?200|}} {{:tests:collision:gc4:all_mlavaryd_fit_rv_disp.png?200|}}
 +
tests/collision/gc4/method_comp.1476353947.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:28 (external edit)