User Tools

Site Tools


tests:collision:gc4

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
tests:collision:gc4 [2016/10/11 07:46] v.henault-brunettests:collision:gc4 [2022/10/24 12:26] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
 === M4 mass modelling challenge: method comparison === === M4 mass modelling challenge: method comparison ===
  
-[[:tests:collision:mock_data|M4 mock data can be found at the top of this page]].+This is a joint project between many participants, centred around mock data from Douglas Heggie’s N-body simulation of M4. The idea is to fit the M4 mock data with various mass modelling techniques and compare the results obtained with these different methods. 
 + 
 +[[:tests:collision:mock_data|M4 mock data can be found here]]. 
 + 
 +Some preliminary results from GCIII are shown [[:tests:collision:gc3:method_comp|here]] 
 + 
 +The current plan is to turn this M4 challenge into one ‘Gaia Challenge' paper (coordinated by Vincent), with contributions from the following people/methods (others welcome too): 
 + 
 +  - Jeans modelling (Laura & Antonio - each with their own code) 
 +  - Multi-mass models with full mass function and SSP model (Vincent) 
 +  - Three-component multi-mass models (Mark) 
 +  - Single-mass models (Mark/Alice) 
 +  - Single-mass models with potential escapers (Ian) 
 + 
 + 
 +The plan is to use combined datasets with increasing level of information: 
 + 
 +  - The surface brightness profile and line-of-sight velocity dispersion profile 
 +  - Then additionally consider HST-like proper-motion dispersion profiles 
 +  - Finally, fits including all the previous data and including Gaia-like proper motions and distances 
 + 
 +Mock data for steps 1 and 2 are currently available. For step 3, Elena Pancino is working on producing Gaia-like observations of the M4 snapshot (with different simulated backgrounds). 
 + 
 +We want to compare how well the different methods recover or fit the following quantities/observables: 
 + 
 +  - total cluster mass $M$ 
 +  - half-mass radius $r_h$ 
 +  - global mass-to-light ratio $M/L$ 
 +  - $M/L$ profile  
 +  - general quality of the fit to the velocity dispersion, surface brightness, and anisotropy profile 
 +  - constraints on the stellar mass function (where applicable) 
 +  - mass in dark remnants (where applicable) 
 + 
 +You can put your [[:tests:collision:gc4:method_comp|results and any interesting plots/ideas here]]. 
  
  
tests/collision/gc4.1476171971.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:26 (external edit)