User Tools

Site Tools


tests:collision:gc4

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
tests:collision:gc4 [2016/10/11 07:46] v.henault-brunettests:collision:gc4 [2022/10/24 12:26] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 === M4 mass modelling challenge: method comparison === === M4 mass modelling challenge: method comparison ===
 +
 +This is a joint project between many participants, centred around mock data from Douglas Heggie’s N-body simulation of M4. The idea is to fit the M4 mock data with various mass modelling techniques and compare the results obtained with these different methods.
  
 [[:tests:collision:mock_data|M4 mock data can be found here]]. [[:tests:collision:mock_data|M4 mock data can be found here]].
 +
 +Some preliminary results from GCIII are shown [[:tests:collision:gc3:method_comp|here]]
 +
 +The current plan is to turn this M4 challenge into one ‘Gaia Challenge' paper (coordinated by Vincent), with contributions from the following people/methods (others welcome too):
 +
 +  - Jeans modelling (Laura & Antonio - each with their own code)
 +  - Multi-mass models with full mass function and SSP model (Vincent)
 +  - Three-component multi-mass models (Mark)
 +  - Single-mass models (Mark/Alice)
 +  - Single-mass models with potential escapers (Ian)
 +
 +
 +The plan is to use combined datasets with increasing level of information:
 +
 +  - The surface brightness profile and line-of-sight velocity dispersion profile
 +  - Then additionally consider HST-like proper-motion dispersion profiles
 +  - Finally, fits including all the previous data and including Gaia-like proper motions and distances
 +
 +Mock data for steps 1 and 2 are currently available. For step 3, Elena Pancino is working on producing Gaia-like observations of the M4 snapshot (with different simulated backgrounds).
 +
 +We want to compare how well the different methods recover or fit the following quantities/observables:
 +
 +  - total cluster mass $M$
 +  - half-mass radius $r_h$
 +  - global mass-to-light ratio $M/L$
 +  - $M/L$ profile 
 +  - general quality of the fit to the velocity dispersion, surface brightness, and anisotropy profile
 +  - constraints on the stellar mass function (where applicable)
 +  - mass in dark remnants (where applicable)
 +
 +You can put your [[:tests:collision:gc4:method_comp|results and any interesting plots/ideas here]].
 +
  
  
tests/collision/gc4.1476171990.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:26 (external edit)