tests:collision
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tests:collision [2015/09/01 10:35] – v.henault-brunet | tests:collision [2022/10/24 12:10] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| **Working group coordinators: | **Working group coordinators: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[: | ||
| + | |||
| You will find here some challenges based on data from collisional N-body models. These mock data are designed to mimic collisional systems like star/ | You will find here some challenges based on data from collisional N-body models. These mock data are designed to mimic collisional systems like star/ | ||
| - | A summary of Gaia Challenge | + | A summary of Gaia Challenge |
| - | Mock datasets for all challenges | + | Mock datasets for all challenges can be downloaded [[: |
| Additional mock datasets and ideas for new challenges are listed [[: | Additional mock datasets and ideas for new challenges are listed [[: | ||
| Links to some useful fitting and analysis tools are listed in the [[: | Links to some useful fitting and analysis tools are listed in the [[: | ||
| - | |||
| - | Ideas and challenges for the Gaia Challenge III workshop (Barcelona) are listed [[: | ||
| - | ===== Goals/ | + | Ideas and goals for the Gaia Challenge |
| - | ===A. Method comparison (now Challenge #4):=== | ||
| - | [[: | ||
| - | We will start with $N$-body snapshots of the M4 models by Heggie (2014): http:// | ||
| - | ===B. Understanding | + | Throughout the Gaia Challenge I-III workshops, we have tackled four specific challenges: |
| - | What will Gaia actually give us (for GCs, open clusters, runaway stars, hypervelocity stars)? What can we do with TGAS? | + | |
| + | **1. Single mass clusters: the interplay of anisotropy and tides (Zocchi et al. in prep)** | ||
| - | ===C. Potential escapers: | + | **2. Clusters with a mass spectrum: testing the validity of multi-mass models (Peuten et al. in prep)** |
| - | a) quantify biases from ignoring them | + | |
| - | b) towards self-consistent mixture models with potential escapers | + | **3. Observational biases (Sollima et al. 2015)** |
| + | **4. Method comparison: Jeans modelling vs Distribution-function based models** | ||
| - | ===D. Rotation:=== | + | Many of the challenges make use of LIMEPY ([[http:// |
| - | include prescription for rotation | + | |
tests/collision.1441103734.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:10 (external edit)