tests:collision
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| tests:collision [2015/09/02 07:48] – v.henault-brunet | tests:collision [2022/10/24 12:10] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| **Working group coordinators: | **Working group coordinators: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[: | ||
| + | |||
| You will find here some challenges based on data from collisional N-body models. These mock data are designed to mimic collisional systems like star/ | You will find here some challenges based on data from collisional N-body models. These mock data are designed to mimic collisional systems like star/ | ||
| Line 21: | Line 24: | ||
| Throughout the Gaia Challenge I-III workshops, we have tackled four specific challenges: | Throughout the Gaia Challenge I-III workshops, we have tackled four specific challenges: | ||
| - | 1. Single mass clusters: the interplay of anisotropy and tides (Zocchi et al. in prep) | + | **1. Single mass clusters: the interplay of anisotropy and tides (Zocchi et al. in prep)** |
| - | + | ||
| - | 2. Clusters with a mass spectrum: testing the validity of multi-mass models (Peuten et al. in prep) | + | |
| - | 3. Observational biases | + | **2. Clusters with a mass spectrum: testing the validity of multi-mass models |
| - | 4. Method comparison: Jeans modelling vs Distribution-function based models | + | **3. Observational biases (Sollima et al. 2015)** |
| - | Many of the challenges make use of LIMEPY (Gieles & Zocchi 2015), developed in the context of the Gaia Challenge. | + | **4. Method comparison: Jeans modelling vs Distribution-function based models** |
| + | Many of the challenges make use of LIMEPY ([[http:// | ||
tests/collision.1441180101.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:10 (external edit)