User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
tests:sphtri

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
tests:sphtri [2015/09/03 13:25] – justintests:sphtri [2022/10/24 12:10] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 8: Line 8:
 **Key working group coordinator:** Justin Read  **Key working group coordinator:** Justin Read 
  
 +**Summary of 2015 Gaia Challenge:** {{:tests:summary_sphericaltriaxial.pdf|Summary GCIII}}
 ---- ----
  
Line 23: Line 24:
   * [[:tests:sphtri:triaxial|Triaxial models]]   * [[:tests:sphtri:triaxial|Triaxial models]]
   * [[:tests:sphtri:tidal|Tidally stripped models]]   * [[:tests:sphtri:tidal|Tidally stripped models]]
 +  * [[:tests:sphtri:axion|Axion DM model]]
 ====== Priority order of runs ====== ====== Priority order of runs ======
  
Line 33: Line 34:
   * The above with lower sampling (1000 stars; 100 stars). You may prefer to do the sampling tests just for one system in which case start with the isotropic models, as above.   * The above with lower sampling (1000 stars; 100 stars). You may prefer to do the sampling tests just for one system in which case start with the isotropic models, as above.
   * Split component models (if your method is capable of this; again with velocity error).    * Split component models (if your method is capable of this; again with velocity error). 
-  * Triaxial models with velocity error and 10,000 star sampling. Try projections along x (long axis); the short axis and an intermediate axis.+  * Triaxial models with velocity error and 10,000 star sampling. Try projections along X (long axis); and the intermediate axis I.
   * Tidally stripped models with velocity error and 10,000 star sampling.   * Tidally stripped models with velocity error and 10,000 star sampling.
  
Line 82: Line 83:
   *   * half-projeted-mass radius <latex>$R_{1/2}$</latex> (<latex>$R_{\rm eff}$</latex> in ellitpical galaxy parlance) and uncertainty (although one could numerically estimate it by fitting <latex>$\nu(r)$</latex> and projecting).   *   * half-projeted-mass radius <latex>$R_{1/2}$</latex> (<latex>$R_{\rm eff}$</latex> in ellitpical galaxy parlance) and uncertainty (although one could numerically estimate it by fitting <latex>$\nu(r)$</latex> and projecting).
   * Should we provide maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) values of the profiles as well? This seems relevant for the DM density profiles of <latex>$\gamma_{\rm DM}$</latex> (core DM) models, for which the median slope is not 0, but the MLE slope is.   * Should we provide maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) values of the profiles as well? This seems relevant for the DM density profiles of <latex>$\gamma_{\rm DM}$</latex> (core DM) models, for which the median slope is not 0, but the MLE slope is.
-  * Could add <latex>$J_{\rm LOS}$</latex> and <latex>$J_{\rm ap}$</latex> (line-of-sight and aperture terms for the γ-ray emission from DM annihilation.+  * Could add <latex>$J_{\rm LOS}$</latex> and <latex>$J_{\rm ap}$</latex> (line-of-sight and aperture terms for the γ-ray emission from DM annihilation).
  
 //Questions on comparisons of methods// //Questions on comparisons of methods//
tests/sphtri.1441286727.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:10 (external edit)