tests:astropars:challenge1
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
tests:astropars:challenge1 [2014/10/30 13:13] – created randrae | tests:astropars:challenge1 [2022/10/24 12:26] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Challenge 1: Moving groups ====== | ====== Challenge 1: Moving groups ====== | ||
+ | ===== Objectives ===== | ||
+ | * Test our ability to identify known young moving groups in velocity space as a function of distance and RVS precision. | ||
+ | * Investigate Gaia-like data, to quantify the expected errors and reveal new methods for identifying groups with accurate distance information | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== YOUNG MOVING GROUPS ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are around a dozen young (<100 Myr) sparse moving groups known within the | ||
+ | solar neighbourhood (d<150 pc). They are the remnants of recent low-density star | ||
+ | formation events, some of which are associated with the Sco-Cen OB association (Beta | ||
+ | Pic, TW Hydrae, Eps Cha), the Pleiades (AB Dor) and IC 2391 (Argus). | ||
+ | |||
+ | We know that these groups are reasonably coherent in velocity space (see below). | ||
+ | Most of the scatter in this plot is due to uncertain distances, usually found from | ||
+ | proper motions and the mean group space motion (derived from a handful of early-type | ||
+ | members in each group observed by Hipparcos). While several of the groups have | ||
+ | distinct velocities (Argus, Octans, AB Dor), many are found within a “good box” | ||
+ | (Zuckerman & Song 2004) around the solar peculiar motion. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Unlike open clusters, association members are very sparse, with their nearest | ||
+ | stellar neighbours highly unlikely to be group members. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | With the high quality Gaia data to first order it is possible to visually identify | ||
+ | similar over-densities in phase space. To test the effectiveness of RVS velocities, | ||
+ | we offset several known moving in velocity and increasing distances from the Sun, | ||
+ | trying to recover the samples in UVWXYZ space. Even at 300 pc it is trivial to find | ||
+ | over-densities in distance-velocity space (e,g, near U=0 km/s,V=0 km/s). | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, it’s necessary to consider full 3D velocities, as the over-densities are | ||
+ | not always apparent in some projections: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | This could obviously be automated with well-known clustering methods. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *** To do: test on the 500 pc Group D sample *** | ||
+ | |||
+ | The weak point is the RVS velocities, which have typical errors of at least several | ||
+ | km/s at these distances and spectral types: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | This has the effect of smearing out the UVW over densities, reducing their contrast | ||
+ | over the background field stars. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Young stars are typically several magnitudes above the main sequence and well | ||
+ | separated from older field stars, as seen in the G-band HR diagram. With accurate | ||
+ | distances for millions of stars, we can use this property to increase the contrast | ||
+ | between the groups and the field stars. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *** GOG does not appear to be respecting the absolute magnitudes | ||
+ | investigate this properly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Also combine with other ancillary catalogues, e.g. GALEX, 2MASS, WISE | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== NEXT STEPS ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * What about log(g)? Is there sufficient information in the BP/RP spectra to select | ||
+ | low-gravity objects? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * (Re-)defining empirical samples of young stars in Gaia photometric/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Most of the scatter in the CMD and phase space plots above is due to the uncertain | ||
+ | kinematic distances of members without Hipparcos parallaxes. How these look with | ||
+ | essentially zero distance error remains to be seen. | ||
+ | |||
+ | With the mean space motions of known groups nailed down, it will be trivial to | ||
+ | identify new faint group members from their Gaia proper motions and distances along, | ||
+ | with confirmatory RVs and youth indicators from ground-based spectroscopy. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== FAKE GROUP GENERATOR ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Probably very instructive to quickly code up a package to sample “perfect” IMFs and | ||
+ | isochrones and create fake groups with known velocity dispersions, | ||
+ | structures (spherical, filaments, sub-structure) and binary properties. These can be | ||
+ | convolved with realistic Gaia errors and embedded in GUMS samples to test our | ||
+ | methods for identifying groups. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ |
tests/astropars/challenge1.1414674820.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:26 (external edit)