User Tools

Site Tools


tests:astropars:challenge2

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
tests:astropars:challenge2 [2014/10/31 09:47] – [Comparison to RVS and BP/RP spectra] randraetests:astropars:challenge2 [2022/10/24 12:26] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
 ===== Objectives ===== ===== Objectives =====
  
-  * Employ high-resolution spectra from X-shooter library to investigate how the Gaia spectra will look like.+  * Employ high-resolution spectra from X-shooter archive to investigate how the Gaia spectra will look like.
   * Investigate GSP-Phot performance on X-shooter spectra.   * Investigate GSP-Phot performance on X-shooter spectra.
  
 ===== Comparison to RVS and BP/RP spectra ===== ===== Comparison to RVS and BP/RP spectra =====
 +
 +  * Gaia RVS spectra and corresponding segments of x-shooter spectra look very similar. Ca-Triplet lines are easily identified and other prominent lines are also in obvious correspondence.
 +  * x-shooter spectra contain telluric bands around 760nm and 950nm. In fact, BP/RP shows prominent dips there, which are NOT reflected by space-based instrument models. That must be a problem when modelling those spectra with GSP-Phot.
  
 {{:tests:compare-spectra.png|}} {{:tests:compare-spectra.png|}}
 +
 +
 +
 +===== GSP-Phot performance on x-shooter spectra =====
 +
 +  * Paula compiled mean parameters for all stars from Pastel. (These are no "true" values but mean literature values.)
 +  * Paula's data contains a lot of giants. GSP-Phot lacks giants in its training data, i.e., it is unlikely to perform well on giants (c.f. [[:tests:astropars:challenge4|Challenge 4]]).
 +  * GSP-Phot performs very poorly on x-shooter spectra: Teff is loosely related for some stars, but logg looks rather random and GSP-Phot tends to assign too low [Fe/H].
 +
 +{{:compare-pastel-masked-tellurics.png|}}
 +
 +== Possible explanations for poor GSP-Phot performance ==
 +
 +  * x-shooter spectra are ground-based spectra, including telluric features, that are not part of the Gaia spectra.
 +  * Lack of giants in GSP-Phot training data.
 +  * x-shooter spectra were processed with GOG version 14, whereas GSP-Phot training data was processed with GOG version 8.
 +
 +
 +
 +===== Andy's SICK performance on x-shooter spectra =====
tests/astropars/challenge2.1414748821.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:26 (external edit)