Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tests:collision:gc3 [2015/09/01 10:37] – v.henault-brunet
+++ tests:collision:gc3 [2022/10/24 12:26] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===== GC III =====
+Active participants: Ian Claydon, Mark Gieles, Vincent Henault-Brunet, Miklos Peuten, Anna Lisa Varri, Laura Watkins, Alice Zocchi.
 ==== Goals/projects for GC III workshop ====
-===A. Method comparison (now Challenge #4):===
+===A. Method comparison (a.k.a. Challenge #4):===
-[[:tests:collision:method_comp|Jeans modelling vs. Distribution-function]] based models for fitting mock data of GCs.
-We will start with $N$-body snapshots of the M4 models by Heggie (2014): http://datashare.is.ed.ac.uk/handle/10283/618
+For this Challenge, initiated in GC III in Barcelona, we decided to compare fitting methods
+  - Jeans modelling (Laura)
+  - Single mass DF modelling (Alice)
+  - Multimass DF modelling (Miklos, Mark)
+Results can go [[:tests:collision:gc3:method_comp|here]]
 ===B. Understanding Gaia errors:===
-What will Gaia actually give us (for GCs, open clusters, runaway stars, hypervelocity stars)? What can we do with TGAS?
+[[:tests:collision:gc3:errors|What will Gaia actually give us]] (for GCs, open clusters, runaway stars, hypervelocity stars)? What can we do with TGAS?
 ===C. Potential escapers:===
-a) quantify biases from ignoring them
+a) [[:tests:collision:gc3:escapers|quantify biases]] from ignoring them
 b) towards self-consistent mixture models with potential escapers
@@ Line 18: / Line 26: @@
 ===D. Rotation:===
-include prescription for rotation in multi-mass DF models.
+include [[:tests:collision:gc3:rotation|prescription for rotation]] in multi-mass DF models.