tests:collision:gc2_archive:challenge3
Table of Contents
GC2: Challenge 3
Simulated observations and biases
PI: Antonio Sollima
Other participants: Eduardo Balbinot, Mark Gieles, Alice Zocchi, Anna Lisa Varri, Vincent Henault-Brunet
Questions to address:
- How different are the fits when considering: 1) all stars and 2) only visible stars?
- Is it better to consider luminosity weighted profiles, or number density profiles?
- How much can we do with 2 velocity components instead of 1 (i.e. with Gaia data)?
Snapshots from Sections C and D of the Mock data page can be used for this challenge.
Including GAIA realistic errors
Using PyGaia 0.6 and the NBODY snapshots in Sections B.
Method:
- Assume a position for the cluster in the Galaxy (X,Y,Z taken from Harris catalogue)
- Transform phase-space coordinates to observed ones (
pygaia.astrometry.vectorastrometry.phaseSpaceToAstrometry
) - Compute errors using
parallaxErrorSkyAvg
andparallaxErrorSkyAvg
- Back to phase-space with ´
astrometryToPhaseSpace
On the plots bellow the red dots are computed using error free data and the black dots using the GAIA error model. The quantity shown is the on-sky velocity dispersion versus the distance to the cluster centre.
Other plots:
CMD in GAIA photometric system for stars in the snapshot (in this example the cluster is at 3kpc)
Observed three component velocities (black) and real ones (red) as a function of observed GAIA BP magnitude
tests/collision/gc2_archive/challenge3.txt · Last modified: 2022/10/24 12:28 by 127.0.0.1